STARS can’t possibly have formed before the big bang, which is why astronomers have puzzled for decades over data that implies some stars are older than the Universe. “Even five years ago we had a factor of two uncertainty,” says Wendy Freeman of the Carnegie Observatories in California. Now new data from the Hubble Space Telescope has resolved the contradiction. Harvey Richer of the University of British Columbia says the measurements imply that the oldest stars formed about one billion years after the big bang, making the whole Universe just under 14 billion years old.
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New Å®ÉúСÊÓÆµ
Explore the latest news, articles and features

Mind
Floatation tanks deployed to combat PTSD after devastating wildfires
News

Mind
What is love? Even a meeting on the subject can't find the answer
News

Mind
How I used psychology to come back from the worst year of my life
Features

Health
The 3 things you need to know about protein, according to an expert
Comment
Popular articles
Trending New Å®ÉúСÊÓÆµ articles
1
The ‘doomsday’ glacier’s giant ice shelf is about to break away
2
How I used psychology to come back from the worst year of my life
3
Why autism pioneer Uta Frith wants to dismantle the spectrum
4
CAR T-cell therapy bolstered by stiffening up cancer cells first
5
The hidden pockets of the universe where the future can cause the past
6
Asteroid set to fly very close to Earth
7
A new tectonic plate boundary could be forming in southern Africa
8
PCOS has been officially renamed PMOS, and it’s a momentous move
9
The Ebola emergency shines a light on the urgent need for new vaccines
10
What if the idea of the autism spectrum is completely wrong?