A REPORT released this week casts doubt on the idea of “clean coal”. The
report, written by Sydney-based independent energy consultant Mark Ellis, also
criticises the large allocation of Australian government funds to coal
projects—about $80 million per year, it estimates. Ellis was
commissioned to write the report, called Can coal be clean?, by the community
group Aidwatch. It argues that improved technologies for burning coal might
actually increase carbon dioxide emissions as well as being costly. Fluidised
bed combustion and advanced pulverised fuel technologies will increase carbon
emissions and costs, Ellis says. Some other approaches, such as using gas or
solar energy, would reduce emissions but increase costs. The only approach that
saves money as well as fuel is improving the efficiency of using energy. Ellis’
report is available from Aidwatch, PO Box 652 Woollahra 2025, NSW.
More from New Å®ÉúСÊÓÆµ
Explore the latest news, articles and features

Mind
Floatation tanks deployed to combat PTSD after devastating wildfires
News

Mind
What is love? Even a meeting on the subject can't find the answer
News

Mind
How I used psychology to come back from the worst year of my life
Features

Health
The 3 things you need to know about protein, according to an expert
Comment
Popular articles
Trending New Å®ÉúСÊÓÆµ articles
1
The ‘doomsday’ glacier’s giant ice shelf is about to break away
2
The hidden pockets of the universe where the future can cause the past
3
A new tectonic plate boundary could be forming in southern Africa
4
Why autism pioneer Uta Frith wants to dismantle the spectrum
5
How I used psychology to come back from the worst year of my life
6
Asteroid set to fly very close to Earth
7
Himalayan wolf-dog hybrids emerge as a threat to wolves and people
8
CAR T-cell therapy bolstered by stiffening up cancer cells first
9
SpaceX is about to launch tallest and most powerful rocket in history
10
Where did the laws of physics come from? I think I've found the answer