Å®ÉúСÊÓÆµ

How does the experience of reading a book differ from listening to it?

Studies show we are more analytical when reading a novel rather than listening to it on audiobook, says one reader

27 August 2025

Book, reading and relax with teen on bed in home for weekend education, literature or study. Hobby, novel or storytelling with boy in bedroom of apartment for development, growth or learning; Shutterstock ID 2541134517; purchase_order: -; job: -; client: -; other: -

PeopleImages.com/Yuri A/Shutterstock

Last Word is New Å®ÉúСÊÓÆµâ€™s long-running series in which readers give scientific answers to each other’s questions, ranging from the minutiae of everyday life to absurd astronomical hypotheticals. To answer a question or ask a new one, email lastword@newscientist.com

How does the experience of reading a good novel differ from listening to the same story on audiobook? Are different parts of the brain engaged?

Inés AntÓn Méndez
Madrid, Spain

There are definitely different parts of the brain engaged, at the very least, at the beginning of the process: reading engages the visual system for letter/word recognition and listening engages the auditory system for phoneme (speech sound) recognition. But I suspect that the questioner means differences further down the line.

As New Å®ÉúСÊÓÆµ has reported (27 May 2023, p 51), there is some evidence that the processing depth of the two modalities can vary – with reading inducing a more analytical mode than listening.

There are many reasons why this may be the case. It could be that, reading being a relatively recent development in the history of humankind, it is more cognitively demanding, which could ultimately result in a deeper level of analysis than when the task is easier and can be achieved with shallower processing. The fact that one can multitask when listening, but not so much when reading, testifies to the different cognitive demands of the two modalities.

Once the information is extracted, however, it is likely to follow the same path. So, for material for which the analytical and instinctive paths don’t deliver different results, how these results are then stored in memory or associate with other knowledge the reader/listener has is probably similar.

With one exception: when committing new information to memory, the what (the content) is processed independently from other ancillary information relating to contextual factors at play when obtaining information, such as where you obtained it, when, etc (which is called source memory). In our case, the “what” of what was read or heard will be accompanied by a different “how” depending on the modality.

Still, I am an avid consumer of both printed books and audiobooks and sometimes I can´t remember whether a particular one was consumed through my eyes or my ears. This is because source memory is more labile and likely to be forgotten, leaving only the content or item memory.

There is one breed of cat that is able to come head first down a tree – the Norwegian forest cat. I have seen mine do it

Incidentally, I have the same thing with languages. I often can’t remember whether I read (or heard) something in English or Spanish. So, language is also treated as source memory and not part of the “essential” content.

To answer this question – or ask a new one – email lastword@newscientist.com.

Questions should be scientific enquiries about everyday phenomena, and both questions and answers should be concise. We reserve the right to edit items for clarity and style. Please include a postal address, daytime telephone number and email address.

Å®ÉúСÊÓÆµ retains total editorial control over the published content and reserves all rights to reuse question and answer material that has been submitted by readers in any medium or in any format.

Terms and conditions apply.

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New Å®ÉúСÊÓÆµ events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop