On your waiting-to-read shelf? “I rarely read books not connected with my research or my own writing.” This is not restrictive, he says, “since both my research and writing span broad areas, and the books pile grows faster than I can deplete it”. He even wrote about The Da Vinci Code (Bantam, 2003). How was it? “Michael Brown can tell a good story in a formulaic fashion,” he says. “But I found his terse, breathless style annoying, and persevered because I had agreed to write about it.” Devlin reckons Brown got about half of the maths wrong, “almost certainly because he used popular sources…
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New Å®ÉúСÊÓÆµ
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending New Å®ÉúСÊÓÆµ articles
1
The Selfish Gene at 50: Why Dawkins’s evolution classic still holds up
2
Mystery of the ancient giant stone jars of Laos may have been solved
3
The distant world that is our best hope of finding alien life
4
We may finally know why dinosaurs like T. rex evolved tiny arms
5
Solar farm on the ocean outperforms land-based solar in Taiwan
6
Photos reveal unexpected details from the world's first atomic test
7
PMOS shows us why many scientific terms need to be renamed
8
How to nurture infant microbiomes for a lifetime of good mental health
9
Can we harness quantum effects to create a new kind of healthcare?
10
After news about Oliver Sacks's "lies", we revisit his best-loved book



