The worldwide trend for increased collaboration between scientists may not be
such a good thing. Sylvan Katz and Ben Martin of the University of Sussex’s
Science Policy Research Unit say they have anecdotal evidence that personality
clashes, conflicts over patents and increased administration and travelling
often throw a spanner in the collaborative works. But their attempts to compare
fully the pros and cons of research collaboration were defeated by a lack of
data, says Katz in the latest issue of Research Policy (vol 26, p
1).
More from New Å®ÉúСÊÓÆµ
Explore the latest news, articles and features

Life
Himalayan wolf-dog hybrids emerge as a threat to wolves and people
News

Environment
First test of CO2 removal with green sand finds no harm to marine life
News

Space
SpaceX is about to launch tallest and most powerful rocket in history
News

Environment
Cleaning up air pollution could weaken vital AMOC ocean current
News
Popular articles
Trending New Å®ÉúСÊÓÆµ articles
1
Why autism pioneer Uta Frith wants to dismantle the spectrum
2
Where did the laws of physics come from? I think I've found the answer
3
Can cloud seeding save us from water bankruptcy?
4
Himalayan wolf-dog hybrids emerge as a threat to wolves and people
5
Science doesn't have a monopoly on good ideas
6
New Å®ÉúСÊÓÆµ recommends a smart new account of human exceptionalism
7
The truth about de-extinction: is it even possible, and why do it?
8
SpaceX is about to launch tallest and most powerful rocket in history
9
What if the idea of the autism spectrum is completely wrong?
10
CAR T-cell therapy bolstered by stiffening up cancer cells first