Large parts of the Amazon rainforest have been cleared for cattle ranching Paralaxis/Alamy
Destruction of rainforest for cattle ranching is making the Amazon biome more vulnerable to irreversible collapse, which could occur within decades if deforestation continues.
A landmark 2022 on tipping points found the Amazon would likely suffer widespread dieback at global warming of 3.5掳C and potentially as low as 2掳C. That鈥檚 worrying, as estimates put Earth on track to warm by about 2.6掳C to 2.7掳C above pre-industrial temperatures by 2100. But the research didn’t include deforestation, which has already resulted in the loss of at least 15 per cent of the Amazon.
Advertisement
at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany and his colleagues have now modelled Amazon dieback with scenarios involving both rising global temperatures and severe deforestation until 2050. If total forest loss increases to 22 per cent, the Amazon could suffer widespread dieback with as little as 1.5掳C of global warming, they found. The world has already experienced 1.3掳C to 1.4掳C of warming and could hit 1.5掳C by the end of this decade.
Deforestation slowed last year, but if it resurges, the Amazon could cross a tipping point as soon as 2031. The timing and extent of dieback predicted by the model varied depending on how much carbon humanity emits, with deforestation rates of 22 to 28 per cent leading to 62 to 77 per cent of the Amazon biome becoming grassland, savanna or scrubby forest.
鈥淲e found that there’s this about-2-degree reduction of the critical global warming threshold when deforestation is considered,鈥 says Wunderling. 鈥淭he reason why deforestation is so crucial is that it undermines this atmospheric moisture recycling feedback.鈥
Free newsletter
Sign up to The Earth Edition
Unmissable news about our planet, delivered straight to your inbox each month.

Vast atmospheric rivers carry moisture from the Atlantic Ocean across the Amazon. After rain falls on one part of the forest, the trees transpire some of that moisture back into the air, which carries it to another part to repeat the process. Up to 50 per cent of the rainfall in the western Amazon is recycled from the forest itself.
But cutting down areas of the forest reduces this moisture recycling and kills off other areas downwind, which kills off further areas in a domino effect. 鈥淚t only needs a little bit of a push from global warming to make these cascading transitions possible,鈥 says Wunderling.
While concerning, the findings are based on a high deforestation rate that would eat into areas that are currently protected, according to at the University of Sussex in the UK, who worked on the 2022 tipping point study.
Brazil more than 28,000 square kilometres of primary forest in 2024, equalling its previous record. But it nearly halved that rate in 2025, and President Luiz In谩cio Lula da Silva has promised to halt Amazon deforestation by 2030. Achieving that would probably avoid the tipping point even if the world keeps warming.
鈥淪topping all deforestation is probably optimistic,鈥 Armstrong McKay says. 鈥淏ut even if there is some deforestation continuing, it probably won鈥檛 meet this worst-case scenario modelled here.鈥
All the same, Brazil still lost about 0.5 per cent of its primary forest in 2025. And for the past two years, two-thirds of forest destruction has been due to wildfires, which typically start when farmers burn vegetation in deforested areas but then escape into the neighbouring forest.
Once almost unheard of, wildfires can now spread because the rainforest is hotter and drier, conditions that will be worsened by the El Ni帽o climate phase later this year. As a result, the study may be underestimating the vulnerability of the Amazon, according to at the University of Leeds, UK.
鈥淲e’re getting these much bigger fires,鈥 he says. 鈥淭hat is worrying if we have moved into a new kind of regime where that can happen more and more.鈥
Already, the Amazon has from a carbon sink to a carbon source, and widespread dieback could emit enough carbon to heat the globe by as much as 0.2掳C. It would also destroy the world鈥檚 biggest store of terrestrial biodiversity.
鈥淲e really want to be backing away from that threshold, rather than creeping towards it,鈥 says Spracklen.
Journal reference
Nature
Topics:



