女生小视频

Earth

The Meg: Real Megalodon shark would eat Jason Statham for breakfast

By Michael Marshall

10 August 2018

New 女生小视频. Science news and long reads from expert journalists, covering developments in science, technology, health and the environment on the website and the magazine.

This week you can go to the cinema and see Jason Statham take on a giant prehistoric shark. sees the action star face off against a Megalodon, a long-extinct shark far larger than today鈥檚 great whites.

The film and , partly because it seems to have embraced the inherent daftness of its premise. Unlike Jaws, which featured a living species of shark 鈥 albeit with an uncharacteristic taste for human flesh, rather than seal 鈥 The Meg is the Jurassic World of shark movies.

That鈥檚 a good thing. Unlike Jaws, The Meg is unlikely to scare anyone out of the water or encourage a 鈥溾 attitude towards sharks 鈥 many of which are threatened species in need of protection.

For an extinct creature, Megalodon gets a lot of press, which gives the impression we know a lot about it. We don鈥檛, says palaeontologist of the University of Southampton, UK.

Pretty much all we have is teeth, which are startlingly big. 鈥淭he record is 16.8 centimetres from base to tip,鈥 says Naish. Otherwise, their bodies have not been preserved. Being sharks, their skeleton was made of cartilage rather than bone, which doesn鈥檛 fossilise. There are a few vertebrae, which were bonier than the rest of the skeleton, but that鈥檚 all.

Mystery monster

As a result, even something as basic as how long they were is an estimate, derived by measuring the teeth. The shark in The Meg is apparently 鈥溾 or 22 to 27 metres, which is an exaggeration. 鈥淐urrent thinking is that it鈥檚 around 15-20 metres,鈥 says Naish. Reconstructions of their jaws as large enough for a person to sit inside for a photo opportunity are also exaggerated.

Regardless, Megalodon was a whopper and would no doubt polish off Jase for breakfast. Great white sharks top out around 6 metres, and even blue whales, the largest animals ever, .

The lack of bones means we don鈥檛 know what they looked like, or where they fit into the shark family tree. 鈥淚t鈥檚 somewhere within the group of sharks called the Lamniformes,鈥 says Naish. Also known as , this group includes great whites and many other species including basking sharks, megamouth sharks and goblin sharks. It鈥檚 not clear where Megalodon fits: people have imagined it as a huge great white, but 鈥渢hat might be wrong鈥. Accordingly, there is no consensus on the scientific name.

However, we do know what Megalodon ate. 鈥淭here鈥檚 bite marks on whale and dolphin bones that come from the right time,鈥 says Naish. 鈥淚t does seem to have been a marine mammal predator.鈥 That鈥檚 to be expected, as it鈥檚 what great white sharks eat.

And there is . 鈥淭his species used shallow-water ecosystems like the Panama Bay as a nursery,鈥 says of Swansea University, UK.鈥 Unusually small Megalodon teeth from this region seem to belong to juveniles, which stayed there until they were big enough to hunt in the open sea.

New 女生小视频. Science news and long reads from expert journalists, covering developments in science, technology, health and the environment on the website and the magazine.

Gone for good

Despite what and a daft Discovery Channel mock-documentary claimed, it鈥檚 extremely unlikely that there are Megalodons lurking in the sea today.

They went extinct , according to a study co-authored by Pimiento, who has spent ten years figuring out what happened. One issue seems to have been like great white sharks and orcas, which meant the Megalodons struggled to get enough food.

But the big reveal came in 2017, when Pimiento鈥檚 team discovered that Megalodon was only one victim of . Among large marine animals, 鈥36 per cent of all genera became extinct around the same time,鈥 says Pimiento.

The key factor seems to have been changing sea levels, which reduced the volume of shallow, coastal waters 鈥 Megalodon鈥檚 hunting grounds. 鈥淲e proposed that that reduction in area caused the extinction, because the animals didn鈥檛 have enough space to find food,鈥 says Pimiento.

Lurking in the depths

People have offered two lines of evidence for Megalodon鈥檚 survival, says Naish. Certain teeth were claimed to be just 10,000 years old, for no good reason, and there have been a few sightings. Naish and co-authors for their book Cryptozoologicon and found they 鈥渁re either just tall tales or hoaxes, or they鈥檙e mistakes鈥.

There are surely plenty of marine species waiting to be discovered, including some big surprises, but they are likely to dwell in the deep sea. The megamouth shark was only discovered in 1976 because it lives in the depths.

Megalodon doesn鈥檛 fit this profile. 鈥淭his is a surface-dwelling coastal shelf predator of big mammals,鈥 says Naish. 鈥淎re you telling me that throughout the whole of history we don鈥檛 have any evidence?鈥

The evidence should be easy to come by, because sharks shed teeth constantly and Megalodon teeth are 15 centimetres long. 鈥淭hey鈥檙e really difficult to miss.鈥

Open wide: the jaws of a real Megalodon

Open wide: the jaws of a real Megalodon

American Museum of Natural History

Sign up to our weekly newsletter

Receive a weekly dose of discovery in your inbox. We'll also keep you up to date with New 女生小视频 events and special offers.

Sign up
Piano Exit Overlay Banner Mobile Piano Exit Overlay Banner Desktop