Å®ÉúСÊÓÆµ

G8 nations agree on need for emissions cuts

In a joint statement, world leaders agree on the need for "substantial global emissions reductions" to fight climate change – but the lack of definite targets worries some

After a stand-off lasting six years, Europe appears to have persuaded the US to re-engage with the world to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases.

In a joint statement from the meeting of G8 industrialised nations in Heiligendamm, Germany, world leaders agree on the need for “substantial global emissions reductions� to fight climate change. . You can find a draft version of the statement, with the US’s comments .

In a single reference to specific targets, George W. Bush commits the US to “consider seriously� matching pledges by the European Union, Japan and Canada to cut emissions by at least 50% by 2050.

But the declaration is much vaguer on the near-term targets needed after the Kyoto protocol lapses in 2012. It says: “We agree on the need for frameworks that will accelerate action over the next decade.� However, an EU proposal for 20% emissions cut by 2020 has been left out.

“Appropriate forum�

The G8 nations represent 13% of the world’s population, but are responsible for 43% of greenhouse-gas emissions. The US reiterates that it would not accept national targets until major industrialising nations like China, India, Brazil, Mexico and South Africa agree to their own emissions limits – something China rejected only days ago.

But Bush has backed off his pre-summit suggestion that future negotiations should take place outside the United Nations framework. The statement “acknowledges that the UN climate process is the appropriate forum for negotiations,� says the UN’s chief negotiator, Yvo de Boer.

The call for agreement on a successor to the Kyoto protocol to be completed by 2009, would “re-energise� UN talks, he says, which stalled last December in Nairobi, Kenya. They resume in Bali, Indonesia, in December 2007.

“This is a breakthrough,� de Boer says, “and will send important signals on the readiness of industrialised nations and emerging economies to act.�

Clean tech vital

Å®ÉúСÊÓÆµs agree. “It is a positive step that has acknowledged that the UN is the way forward,â€� says Phil Jones, director of climate research at the University of East Anglia, UK. He also supports the leaders’ commitment to more research and development into clean technologies.

“Technology is a key to mastering climate change,� the joint communiqué says. It stresses the importance of “creating supportive market conditions to accelerate commercialisation� of climate-friendly energy technologies. One of the changes in the US stance is its apparent acceptance that national targets are a way to do that.

But some environmentalists say that, in practical terms, the statement hardly differs from the text of the 1992 UN climate change convention , five years before the Kyoto protocol.

That committed the US to acting to prevent “dangerous climate change�, but without specific targets.

Greenpeace has taken the toughest line in Germany: “An agreement without targets is barely worth the paper it is written on.�