女生小视频

Review: Influences on architecture

Healthy Buildings: A Design Primer for a Living Environment by Bill
Holdsworth and Anthony F. Sealey, Longman, pp 148, 拢45

This book is about building design, energy use, radiation hazards and
air quality. It promotes energy-efficient buildings, low-energy 鈥榥atural鈥�
products and traditional or innovative ways of combating cold, heat and
noise. But, while sympathetic to the authors鈥� aims, I am astonished at the
poor writing, poor editing and naive science that Healthy Buildings offers.

Anthony Sealey is an architect and a Fellow of the Royal Meteorological
Society, and has taught science. Bill Holdsworth claims no building services
or other engineering qualification but set up a 鈥榗onsulting group whose
prime base was building services and energy engineering鈥�. They refer frequently
to their 鈥榙esign system鈥�, Echoes (Environmentally Controlled Human Operational
Enclosed/External Space), that appears primarily to be a set of vague or
obscure guidelines such as this, which appears under the puzzling heading
鈥楲ines of sight for healthy living buildings鈥�: 鈥楾he building spot must be
geologically undisturbed . . . ascertain that there is no disturbance of
cosmic and terrestrial influence on the human life form (DNA) . . . take
care of harmonic measures, properties and forms鈥�.

The authors dwell on current building concerns such as 鈥榮ick building
syndrome鈥� (buildings associated with higher than normal absenteeism and
sickness rates, complaints about air quality, headaches, eye problems, dry
mouth and blocked nose), legionnaires鈥� disease and radon. They also make
great play of more contentious issues such as the effects of electromagnetic
radiation. They state that 鈥榚lectromagnetic rays have a wavelength of the
order of 1 cm . . . Natural rays occur in underground watercourses, geological
faults, mineral veins, oil and gas reserves, geomatic (sic) zones, and growing
zones (sic). Artificial rays are now occurring from . . . the mind (meditation,
music, sound, the DNA structure).鈥� Where two underground streams cross,
there is a 鈥榞eopathic disturbance鈥� and the 鈥榞eomagnetic flux鈥� drops from
鈥�65 000 nT鈥� to 鈥�53 000 nT鈥� (unit not defined). This is known as Yin, and
is a 鈥榙ischarge field鈥�. Yang occurs on geological fault lines.

Examples of poor science and half-baked ideas abound. For example, part
of a design for a football stadium with a car park suggests to the authors
that 鈥榗ar exhausts could be collected and converted to provide fuel for
adapted gas-turbine engines鈥�. An energy consumption of 鈥�126 (KW/m 2)/测别补谤鈥�
(confusion between energy and power) is quoted for one building while for
another it is 111 (KW/m 2)/hour鈥� 鈥� try to visualise this!

On a more positive note, the authors do include many interesting examples
of building design, both traditional and innovative. In Poland and Germany,
underground 鈥榯hermolabyrinths鈥�, through which air is drawn for summer cooling
and winter heating, are incorporated into house design. The case studies
would have benefited from more detail and analysis. The authors demonstrate
the need for architects to consider comfort, health and amenity from the
outset of a project; when the design subsequently requires extensive changes,
this can only be a palliative measure.

The authors call for more holistic thinking in building; it is a pity
they do not do justice to their cause.

Nick Spencer-Chapman is a civil engineer and senior lecturer at Oxford
Polytechnic.