THE AMERICAN Secretary of Energy, James Watkins, told Congress on Monday
that the US鈥檚 planned particle accelerator, the Superconducting Super Collider
(SSC), will cost 鈥榓t least one to two billion dollars鈥� more than the $5.9
billion estimated last year. He also admitted that the final cost estimate
may be so high that the collider is not worth building.
鈥榃e might find we鈥檝e priced ourselves out of the thing,鈥� Watkins told
an appropriations subcommittee. 鈥楤ut I think not, I think we鈥檙e going to
make it work.鈥� He promised that Congress would have the final cost estimates
by June.
Watkins also told the subcommittee that he and presidential science
adviser Allan Bromley agree that the SSC has to be built at 鈥榥othing less鈥�
than an energy level of 20 teraelectronvolts; some critics had suggested
reducing the energy in order to cut costs.
Advertisement
Some members of Congress would like to see other nations helping to
pay for the SSC, but do not want the technology for superconducting magnets
to be made available to them. Watkins tried to calm such fears by stating
that a large percentage of magnets will be built in the US. 鈥楾here are four
other nations that are as skilled or more skilled in magnet design than
the US, so the technology transfer may go the other way,鈥� he added.